“We’re going to find you another job”
06 Wednesday Mar 2013
That’s the directive Kate Anderson has been flinging into every sound bite she can leverage these past weeks. With her sweet voice and deceptively soft looks, she summarily asserts without qualification, that she knows just who is a subpar teacher, and she will move them on out.
Well, with 90% of the votes in now and 52.4% trending toward Steve Zimmer, I believe we voters of Los Angeles Unified’s fourth School District (LAUSD4) have requested another job of Ms Anderson. Zimmer’s been doing his well-enough, and the harsh, un-nuanced puppeteering from beyond has been rejected.
As a random mother of 2 teenagers, I awoke to this school board race when 4.5 million industrialist’s dollars poured into my little, local, school district, preempting attention from commonplace travesties such as sluggish fundraising and understaffed schools. In short order it became clear that this is an end-game for a massive, national power struggle in the dismantle-and-privatize-our-government game. Including an assault on the bulwark of labor unions, checks & balances and free thinking, this is a campaign of Herculean scale. And it’s been going on a long time; where have I been?? Without ever noticing it I was moved into a constituency camp termed “parent”, consigned to a group I never knew was conscripted, and ascribed a whole host of concerns and partisan viewpoints I never knew were mine.
Ultimately I have come to feel like a tiny character in a massive, national children’s battle of good-and-evil. Far, far up there in the stratosphere – from about 3000 miles away in fact (the distance to Mayor Bloomberg’s NYC), loom oblating dementors, leaning in on our little neighborhood angling to suck the soul out of our local power of choice, the prerogative of our independently elected school board. It sounds hysterical and fantastical, but reading up on the “School Reform Movement” of the past ten years reveals a presence that is nothing short of democracy-threatening; the scale is right. With a multi-million dollar war chest donated by the 1% who range from nominal democrats to libertarians right on through to ultra-right foreign-born moguls — our tiny corner of the world has become a microcosm for class warfare on a scale I never had a glimmering of just weeks ago.
It turns out, and I just never noticed, that my neighborhood, or at least school board district (which encompasses hundreds of square miles, so it’s hardly little at that) houses more charter schools than anywhere on the planet. And to the uninitiated, these charter schools wouldn’t really signal anything terribly nefarious. The opportunity to involve your child in an angle on education that’s a little bit unorthodox seems terrific, “choice” is clearly unassailable – who could possibly object to a little leavening in the educational mix?
As the child of educators, living in the education and research biz myself, it’s hard to credit too much wrong-doing to any effort devoted to better-serving the transcendental question of how best to educate our children. Because it turns out this is the holy grail, and no one has gotten any closer to finding it since the days of Socrates. The legacy of our educational system in the recent past has been less than exemplary, especially among select demographics.
Therefore “reform” is a fine goal, as unassailable as “choice”. Moreover there is common cause with corporations in educating our children in skills that are useful for modern business. Reforming our schools by addressing the impediments to our children’s learning is vital, and there is no inherent reason not to use corporate dollars toward that end.
However there is no offer to direct the massive funds of this recent election toward present day under-resourced institutions. While those campaign dollars could have significant effect on our school campuses directly, instead they are devoted to closing down what was. Rather than working with teachers and administrators and the other components that compose the scaffolding of our social fabric, the agenda of the School Reform Movement is to remove the incumbent and install a challenger instead. This election silhouettes how reform never was part of the agenda at all; revolution is.
This election, with its shockingly outsized spending has revealed a hidden agenda, as old as the hills. With massive institutions and systems is embedded the opportunity for equally massive personal gain. Prerequisite is private control, wrenched from what was formerly public, democratic governance. Couching this banality of greed in educational ideology has been an effective strategy, but tonight’s results suggest a whisper of increasing awareness and resistance to uncontrolled and unbridled, unjustified change.
Because the evidence is starting to pour in. The Reform School agenda which seeks to install privately setup small, isolated, corporately run charter schools are at best no worse than their public counterparts, and reach a small, select subset of the public besides. They result in breathtaking segregation and privation and an impoverished educational landscape. They leach public resources. Unaffordable, now, are the rich opportunities of varied educational “services” like music programs and art programs, lending libraries and speech and behavioural therapists. This School Reform Emperor has no clothes, and the evidence while slow to come in, is arriving at last.
This, I believe, is the real reason for the recent “billionarie’s-push” to fully enact the privatization agenda of School Reform. As the inferior outcomes of charter schools are revealed with time, so too is this canard of “reform”. Lost in the jockeying for private gain is the vast, ignored needs of the 99%. Social services, support and education are what sustain a democratic society. Replacing the aspirations of upward mobility among our lower and middle classes, codifies a system of short-term gain and massive profit that benefits very few. Removing our educational system from public control is undemocratic, inherently destructive of a sustainable society, and immoral.
I am so glad Steve Zimmer won his LAUSD4 race tonight. But make no mistake about it, this is a small battle in a much larger war.
8 Comments
March 7, 2013 at 10:38 am
Once the unions are busted and all that untouchable public school funding is safely in the hands of the corporations, we will not hear another peep about failing schools.
March 8, 2013 at 3:46 pm
Of course not. At that moment, all our schools will be stellar! The only complaints will come from business leaders who are forced to absorb the costs of retraining prospective employees who will be so deep in debt from student loans that no further financing will be available. Company store, anyone? What fun it will be to watch from the gutters as business’s fight over who owns the debt of the serfs. Then the lawyers will get rich.
March 6, 2013 at 11:08 am
Why we gave space to protest candidate Robert Skeels, who challenged Monica Garcia in her district race for LAUSD School Board: because when you don’t have board members who act with accountability to the people who elected them, you get board members who override local votes for community-managed schools and instead, hand a brand new $68 million dollar K-8 school constructed with bond money over to a local charter chain.
http://www.k12newsnetwork.com/2013/02/robert-d-skeels-a-community-candidate-for-lausd-school-board/
March 6, 2013 at 10:20 am
Well written, and all too true. As more and more parents realize just how badly they’ve been lied to, the lies become weapons that turn back on their sources. This is why we are seeing a rush to take over school systems and boards of education by any means necessary including blatant violations of state and local laws by those we entrusted to enforce them. All for ideological and monetary profit. It’s never really for the kids at all, and any time it does benefit kids, it’s by accident. Even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day. Remain vigilant and resolute, the brute force of money and influence is turning into a rear guard action. We have to retake the territory we have lost.
March 6, 2013 at 9:48 am
great piece;Comment on school board race and I might print it. Please ID yourself and any connections. Send asap to howard.blume@latimes.com.
March 6, 2013 at 9:56 am
Hi — I am so sorry but I can’t really figure out how to manipulate this computer account … I think this is Leonie Haimson writing, so why am I to send this to Howard Blume? I am happy to, but I am trying to verify if he’s the one or you who are trying to contact me?